In our Sofia to Vilnius EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Mercedes-Benz EQB 250+ by 108 minutes, completing the 1950km route in 22h 14min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 8 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 22h 14min (108 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 22min
- Energy: ~318 kWh
- Distance: 1950km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Mercedes-Benz EQB 250+ |
| Travel time |
22h 14min |
24h 2min |
| Charging time: |
1h 22min |
3h 14min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
8 |
| Energy used |
~351 kWh |
~350 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV Zemun Park (10 min, 25% → 63%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 12% → 56%)
-
Stop 3:
Tesco (12 min, 31% → 70%)
-
Stop 4:
Centrum Zakupowe Jan (17 min, 10% → 69%)
-
Stop 5:
Wodny Park Warszawianka (23 min, 10% → 77%)
-
Stop 6:
Hesburger Kantališkiai (10 min, 10% → 38%)
- Arrival: Vilnius
Mercedes-Benz EQB 250+ Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Naplatna rampa Nais istočno (10 min, 56% → 75%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV Zemun Park (32 min, 13% → 81%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (15 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 4:
Tesco (33 min, 10% → 80%)
-
Stop 5:
Biedronka Lotników (22 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 6:
Shell MOP East (21 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 7:
Lakeside (33 min, 10% → 81%)
-
Stop 8:
MOP Rudniki Południe (28 min, 10% → 72%)
- Arrival: Vilnius
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 108-minute advantage over Mercedes-Benz EQB 250+ on this 1950km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 8 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 22min vs 3h 14min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~318 kWh vs ~322 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons