In our Sofia to Vilnius EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Volvo EX90 Twin Motor by 67 minutes, completing the 1950km route in 22h 14min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 8 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 22h 14min (67 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 22min
- Energy: ~318 kWh
- Distance: 1950km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Volvo EX90 Twin Motor |
| Travel time |
22h 14min |
23h 21min |
| Charging time: |
1h 22min |
2h 24min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
8 |
| Energy used |
~351 kWh |
~350 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV Zemun Park (10 min, 25% → 63%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 12% → 56%)
-
Stop 3:
Tesco (12 min, 31% → 70%)
-
Stop 4:
Centrum Zakupowe Jan (17 min, 10% → 69%)
-
Stop 5:
Wodny Park Warszawianka (23 min, 10% → 77%)
-
Stop 6:
Hesburger Kantališkiai (10 min, 10% → 38%)
- Arrival: Vilnius
Volvo EX90 Twin Motor Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV Zemun Park (26 min, 13% → 69%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 3:
Tesco (15 min, 15% → 53%)
-
Stop 4:
Kaufland Wolkera (16 min, 10% → 36%)
-
Stop 5:
Centrum Zakupowe Jan (10 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 6:
Shell MOP East (14 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 7:
Wodny Park Warszawianka (31 min, 10% → 72%)
-
Stop 8:
Kaufland (22 min, 10% → 56%)
- Arrival: Vilnius
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 67-minute advantage over Volvo EX90 Twin Motor on this 1950km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 8 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 22min vs 2h 24min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~318 kWh vs ~444 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons