In our Sofia to Vilnius EV duel, the Volvo EX60 P12 AWD Electric beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 43 minutes, completing the 1944km route in 21h 50min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 6, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Volvo EX60 P12 AWD Electric needs only 4 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Volvo EX60 P12 AWD Electric
- Total time: 21h 50min (43 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 1h 5min
- Energy: ~336 kWh
- Distance: 1944km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
Volvo EX60 P12 AWD Electric |
| Travel time |
22h 33min |
21h 50min |
| Charging time: |
1h 38min |
1h 5min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
4 |
| Energy used |
~350 kWh |
~350 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV Zemun Park (13 min, 15% → 67%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Tesco (18 min, 27% → 77%)
-
Stop 4:
Centrum Zakupowe Jan (10 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 5:
Shell MOP East (10 min, 16% → 48%)
-
Stop 6:
Wodny Park Warszawianka (19 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 7:
Kaufland (18 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Vilnius
Volvo EX60 P12 AWD Electric Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV Zemun Park (10 min, 37% → 69%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 26% → 68%)
-
Stop 3:
Centrum rekreacji i wypoczynku Hawrań (20 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 4:
Postępu (25 min, 10% → 88%)
- Arrival: Vilnius
Why the Volvo EX60 P12 AWD Electric Won
The Volvo EX60 P12 AWD Electric achieved a 43-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 1944km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 5min vs 1h 38min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~336 kWh vs ~357 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons