In our Sofia to Vilnius EV duel, the Kia EV9 beats the Volvo EX90 Twin Motor by 26 minutes, completing the 1944km route in 22h 55min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Volvo EX90 Twin Motor's 470km range doesn't beat the Kia EV9's 450km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Kia EV9 needs only 7 charging stops compared to 8 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Kia EV9
- Total time: 22h 55min (26 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 2h 0min
- Energy: ~410 kWh
- Distance: 1944km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Kia EV9 |
Volvo EX90 Twin Motor |
| Travel time |
22h 55min |
23h 21min |
| Charging time: |
2h 0min |
2h 24min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
8 |
| Energy used |
~350 kWh |
~350 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Kia EV9 Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV Zemun Park (19 min, 10% → 71%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 3:
Tesco (17 min, 16% → 69%)
-
Stop 4:
Biedronka Lotników (20 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 5:
Shell MOP East (13 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 6:
Wodny Park Warszawianka (22 min, 10% → 74%)
-
Stop 7:
Kaufland (19 min, 10% → 58%)
- Arrival: Vilnius
Volvo EX90 Twin Motor Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV Zemun Park (26 min, 13% → 69%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 3:
Tesco (15 min, 15% → 53%)
-
Stop 4:
Kaufland Wolkera (16 min, 10% → 36%)
-
Stop 5:
Centrum Zakupowe Jan (10 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 6:
Shell MOP East (14 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 7:
Wodny Park Warszawianka (31 min, 10% → 72%)
-
Stop 8:
Kaufland (22 min, 10% → 56%)
- Arrival: Vilnius
Why the Kia EV9 Won
The Kia EV9 achieved a 26-minute advantage over Volvo EX90 Twin Motor on this 1944km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 8 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 2h 0min vs 2h 24min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~410 kWh vs ~443 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons