In our Tallinn to Budapest EV duel, the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 beats the VW ID. Buzz Pro LR by 4 minutes, completing the 1671km route in 22h 21min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 6, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The VW ID. Buzz Pro LR's 389km range doesn't beat the Renault 5 E-Tech 150's 330km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 needs only 8 charging stops compared to 9 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 5 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 22h 21min (4 min faster)
- Charging stops: 8
- Charging time: 2h 30min
- Energy: ~263 kWh
- Distance: 1671km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
VW ID. Buzz Pro LR |
| Travel time |
22h 21min |
22h 25min |
| Charging time: |
2h 30min |
2h 29min |
| Charging stops: |
8 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~301 kWh |
~300 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Tallinn (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Circle K Ādaži (18 min, 12% → 66%)
-
Stop 2:
Neste Šilagalio Žiedo (26 min, 10% → 80%)
-
Stop 3:
McDonald's Dubowo Drugie (34 min, 10% → 92%)
-
Stop 4:
Factory Annopol (13 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 5:
Hotel Górski (12 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 6:
MOP Woźniki Zachód (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 7:
Amic (12 min, 14% → 52%)
-
Stop 8:
Shell (25 min, 10% → 79%)
- Arrival: Budapest
VW ID. Buzz Pro LR Route
- Start: Tallinn (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Neste (14 min, 19% → 54%)
-
Stop 2:
Neste Šilagalio Žiedo (26 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 3:
Kaufland (38 min, 10% → 84%)
-
Stop 4:
Factory Annopol (13 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 5:
Hotel Górski (12 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 6:
MOP Woźniki Zachód (10 min, 10% → 35%)
-
Stop 7:
Xland (13 min, 12% → 48%)
-
Stop 8:
Shell (10 min, 10% → 38%)
-
Stop 9:
Reštaurácia Dvor Lehôtka (13 min, 19% → 52%)
- Arrival: Budapest
Why the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 achieved a 4-minute advantage over VW ID. Buzz Pro LR on this 1671km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 8 stops vs 9 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~263 kWh vs ~369 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons