In our Tallinn to Oslo EV duel, the smart #1 Pro beats the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 by 19 minutes, completing the 1094km route in 26h 47min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Renault 4 E-Tech 150's 327km range doesn't beat the smart #1 Pro's 240km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The smart #1 Pro needs only 5 charging stops compared to 6 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
smart #1 Pro
- Total time: 26h 47min (19 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 1h 16min
- Energy: ~214 kWh
- Distance: 1094km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
smart #1 Pro |
| Travel time |
27h 6min |
26h 47min |
| Charging time: |
1h 35min |
1h 16min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
5 |
| Energy used |
~197 kWh |
~197 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Tallinn (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Rinta-Joupin Autoliike (17 min, 24% → 68%)
-
Stop 2:
VIRTA Schnellladesäule (29 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Circle K (13 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 4:
McDonald's (15 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 5:
McDonald's Hagalundsvägen (11 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 6:
Supercharger Töcksfors Handelspark (10 min, 10% → 41%)
- Arrival: Oslo
smart #1 Pro Route
- Start: Tallinn (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Rinta-Joupin Autoliike (12 min, 26% → 67%)
-
Stop 2:
VIRTA Schnellladesäule (26 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Circle K (13 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Boglundsängen (10 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 5:
Preem Grums (15 min, 10% → 66%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Why the smart #1 Pro Won
The smart #1 Pro achieved a 19-minute advantage over Renault 4 E-Tech 150 on this 1094km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 6 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 16min vs 1h 35min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons