In our Tallinn to Sofia EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Kia Niro EV by 244 minutes, completing the 2421km route in 28h 40min. The key advantage? 7 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 20, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 13 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 28h 40min (244 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 45min
- Energy: ~377 kWh
- Distance: 2421km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Kia Niro EV |
| Travel time |
28h 40min |
32h 44min |
| Charging time: |
1h 45min |
5h 1min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
13 |
| Energy used |
~436 kWh |
~437 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Tallinn (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Neste Šilagalio Žiedo (10 min, 18% → 60%)
-
Stop 2:
Hesburger Kantališkiai (14 min, 34% → 71%)
-
Stop 3:
Factory Annopol (14 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 4:
Centrum Zakupowe Jan (23 min, 10% → 80%)
-
Stop 5:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (14 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 6:
OMV A1 (30 min, 10% → 82%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Kia Niro EV Route
- Start: Tallinn (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Manufaktūra (18 min, 19% → 56%)
-
Stop 2:
Neste Šilagalio Žiedo (33 min, 10% → 72%)
-
Stop 3:
McDonald's Dubowo Drugie (46 min, 10% → 82%)
-
Stop 4:
Factory Annopol (26 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 5:
Shell MOP West (14 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 6:
Biedronka Połomskiego (19 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 7:
Kaufland Wolkera (28 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 8:
Tesco (10 min, 10% → 32%)
-
Stop 9:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (26 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 10:
OMV Backa Topola jug (22 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 11:
JP Putevi Srbije (10 min, 10% → 30%)
-
Stop 12:
Gazprom (27 min, 11% → 47%)
-
Stop 13:
Naplatna rampa Nais zapadno (22 min, 10% → 56%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 244-minute advantage over Kia Niro EV on this 2421km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 13 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 45min vs 5h 1min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~377 kWh vs ~419 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons