In our Tallinn to Sofia EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the smart #1 Pro by 128 minutes, completing the 2421km route in 28h 40min. The key advantage? 7 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 2, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 13 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 28h 40min (128 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 45min
- Energy: ~377 kWh
- Distance: 2421km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
smart #1 Pro |
| Travel time |
28h 40min |
30h 48min |
| Charging time: |
1h 45min |
3h 10min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
13 |
| Energy used |
~436 kWh |
~438 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Tallinn (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Neste Šilagalio Žiedo (10 min, 18% → 60%)
-
Stop 2:
Hesburger Kantališkiai (14 min, 34% → 71%)
-
Stop 3:
Factory Annopol (14 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 4:
Centrum Zakupowe Jan (23 min, 10% → 80%)
-
Stop 5:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (14 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 6:
OMV A1 (30 min, 10% → 82%)
- Arrival: Sofia
smart #1 Pro Route
- Start: Tallinn (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Manufaktūra (14 min, 11% → 61%)
-
Stop 2:
Neste Šilagalio Žiedo (20 min, 10% → 78%)
-
Stop 3:
McDonald's Dubowo Drugie (15 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 4:
Kaufland (12 min, 10% → 37%)
-
Stop 5:
Factory Annopol (16 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 6:
Shell MOP West (10 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 7:
Biedronka Połomskiego (10 min, 17% → 54%)
-
Stop 8:
Kaufland Wolkera (18 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 9:
Tesco (10 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 10:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (21 min, 10% → 80%)
-
Stop 11:
OMV smer Beograd (10 min, 10% → 36%)
-
Stop 12:
JP Putevi Srbije (17 min, 10% → 72%)
-
Stop 13:
Naplatna rampa Nais zapadno (17 min, 10% → 60%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 128-minute advantage over smart #1 Pro on this 2421km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 13 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 45min vs 3h 10min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~377 kWh vs ~474 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons