In our Tallinn to Sofia EV duel, the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi e-tron GT by 74 minutes, completing the 2425km route in 29h 37min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 8 charging stops compared to 11 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 29h 37min (74 min faster)
- Charging stops: 8
- Charging time: 2h 29min
- Energy: ~435 kWh
- Distance: 2425km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Audi e-tron GT |
| Travel time |
29h 37min |
30h 51min |
| Charging time: |
2h 29min |
3h 38min |
| Charging stops: |
8 |
11 |
| Energy used |
~437 kWh |
~437 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Tallinn (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY (10 min, 19% → 61%)
-
Stop 2:
Hesburger Kantališkiai (33 min, 10% → 85%)
-
Stop 3:
Factory Annopol (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
MOP Promna-Kolonia (10 min, 38% → 70%)
-
Stop 5:
Centrum Zakupowe Jan (21 min, 15% → 79%)
-
Stop 6:
Tesco (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (19 min, 12% → 79%)
-
Stop 8:
JP Putevi Srbije (36 min, 10% → 90%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Audi e-tron GT Route
- Start: Tallinn (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Neste (10 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 2:
Neste Šilagalio Žiedo (15 min, 15% → 66%)
-
Stop 3:
Kaufland (30 min, 10% → 81%)
-
Stop 4:
Factory Annopol (10 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 5:
MOP Promna-Kolonia (14 min, 26% → 69%)
-
Stop 6:
HPC Volvo Aleja Powstańców Śląskich (12 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 7:
Tesco Teplická cesta (18 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 8:
Tesco (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 9:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (18 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 10:
OMV smer Beograd (53 min, 10% → 84%)
-
Stop 11:
Naplatna rampa Nais zapadno (28 min, 10% → 53%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Why the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 74-minute advantage over Audi e-tron GT on this 2425km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 8 stops vs 11 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 2h 29min vs 3h 38min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~435 kWh vs ~542 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons