In our Tallinn to Sofia EV duel, the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the smart #1 Pro by 71 minutes, completing the 2425km route in 29h 37min. The key advantage? 5 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 2, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 8 charging stops compared to 13 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 29h 37min (71 min faster)
- Charging stops: 8
- Charging time: 2h 29min
- Energy: ~435 kWh
- Distance: 2425km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance |
smart #1 Pro |
| Travel time |
29h 37min |
30h 48min |
| Charging time: |
2h 29min |
3h 10min |
| Charging stops: |
8 |
13 |
| Energy used |
~437 kWh |
~438 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Tallinn (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY (10 min, 19% → 61%)
-
Stop 2:
Hesburger Kantališkiai (33 min, 10% → 85%)
-
Stop 3:
Factory Annopol (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
MOP Promna-Kolonia (10 min, 38% → 70%)
-
Stop 5:
Centrum Zakupowe Jan (21 min, 15% → 79%)
-
Stop 6:
Tesco (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (19 min, 12% → 79%)
-
Stop 8:
JP Putevi Srbije (36 min, 10% → 90%)
- Arrival: Sofia
smart #1 Pro Route
- Start: Tallinn (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Manufaktūra (14 min, 11% → 61%)
-
Stop 2:
Neste Šilagalio Žiedo (20 min, 10% → 78%)
-
Stop 3:
McDonald's Dubowo Drugie (15 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 4:
Kaufland (12 min, 10% → 37%)
-
Stop 5:
Factory Annopol (16 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 6:
Shell MOP West (10 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 7:
Biedronka Połomskiego (10 min, 17% → 54%)
-
Stop 8:
Kaufland Wolkera (18 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 9:
Tesco (10 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 10:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (21 min, 10% → 80%)
-
Stop 11:
OMV smer Beograd (10 min, 10% → 36%)
-
Stop 12:
JP Putevi Srbije (17 min, 10% → 72%)
-
Stop 13:
Naplatna rampa Nais zapadno (17 min, 10% → 60%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Why the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 71-minute advantage over smart #1 Pro on this 2425km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 8 stops vs 13 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 2h 29min vs 3h 10min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~435 kWh vs ~475 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons