In our Tallinn to Vienna EV duel, the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 beats the smart #1 Pro+ by 8 minutes, completing the 1638km route in 20h 11min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The smart #1 Pro+'s 340km range doesn't beat the Renault 5 E-Tech 150's 330km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 needs only 8 charging stops compared to 9 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 5 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 20h 11min (8 min faster)
- Charging stops: 8
- Charging time: 2h 25min
- Energy: ~258 kWh
- Distance: 1638km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
smart #1 Pro+ |
| Travel time |
20h 11min |
20h 19min |
| Charging time: |
2h 25min |
2h 23min |
| Charging stops: |
8 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~295 kWh |
~294 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Tallinn (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Circle K Ādaži (18 min, 12% → 66%)
-
Stop 2:
Neste Šilagalio Žiedo (26 min, 10% → 80%)
-
Stop 3:
McDonald's Dubowo Drugie (34 min, 10% → 92%)
-
Stop 4:
Factory Annopol (13 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 5:
Hotel Górski (12 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 6:
MOP Woźniki Zachód (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 7:
Uniwar P1 (20 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 8:
Teplárny Brno Olympia DC (12 min, 10% → 48%)
- Arrival: Vienna
smart #1 Pro+ Route
- Start: Tallinn (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Circle K Ādaži (18 min, 14% → 65%)
-
Stop 2:
Neste Šilagalio Žiedo (26 min, 10% → 78%)
-
Stop 3:
McDonald's Dubowo Drugie (20 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 4:
Kaufland (16 min, 10% → 37%)
-
Stop 5:
Factory Annopol (12 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 6:
Hotel Górski (11 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 7:
MOP Woźniki Zachód (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 8:
Uniwar P1 (19 min, 10% → 66%)
-
Stop 9:
Teplárny Brno Olympia DC (11 min, 10% → 47%)
- Arrival: Vienna
Why the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 achieved a 8-minute advantage over smart #1 Pro+ on this 1638km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 8 stops vs 9 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~258 kWh vs ~299 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons