In our Venice to Munich EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 10 minutes, completing the 438km route in 5h 35min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 0 charging stops compared to 1 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 5h 35min (10 min faster)
- Charging stops: 0
- Charging time: 0min
- Energy: ~71 kWh
- Distance: 438km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
5h 35min |
5h 45min |
| Charging time: |
0min |
10min |
| Charging stops: |
0 |
1 |
| Energy used |
~79 kWh |
~79 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Venice (100% charge)
- Charging stop details available in interactive view below
- Arrival: Munich
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Venice (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger (10 min, 10% → 45%)
- Arrival: Munich
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 10-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 438km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 0 stops vs 1 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 0min vs 10min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~71 kWh vs ~72 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons