In our Venice to Munich EV duel, the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 beats the MG MG4 64kWh by 6 minutes, completing the 438km route in 5h 48min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 6, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The MG MG4 64kWh's 360km range doesn't beat the Renault 5 E-Tech 150's 330km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 needs only 1 charging stops compared to 2 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 5 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 5h 48min (6 min faster)
- Charging stops: 1
- Charging time: 14min
- Energy: ~69 kWh
- Distance: 438km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
MG MG4 64kWh |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
5h 54min |
5h 48min |
| Charging time: |
20min |
14min |
| Charging stops: |
2 |
1 |
| Energy used |
~79 kWh |
~79 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
MG MG4 64kWh Route
- Start: Venice (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
ENI Tankstelle (10 min, 19% → 45%)
-
Stop 2:
Eni Tankstelle Gewerbepark Süd (10 min, 13% → 41%)
- Arrival: Munich
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Venice (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Hofer (14 min, 12% → 57%)
- Arrival: Munich
Why the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 achieved a 6-minute advantage over MG MG4 64kWh on this 438km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 1 stops vs 2 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 14min vs 20min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~69 kWh vs ~74 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons