In our Vienna to Athens EV duel, the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 5 minutes, completing the 1711km route in 19h 14min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge's 363km range doesn't beat the Renault 5 E-Tech 150's 330km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 needs only 7 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 5 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 19h 14min (5 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 2h 50min
- Energy: ~270 kWh
- Distance: 1711km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
19h 14min |
19h 19min |
| Charging time: |
2h 50min |
2h 22min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
10 |
| Energy used |
~308 kWh |
~309 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Vienna (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (35 min, 17% → 96%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV smer Beograd (42 min, 10% → 98%)
-
Stop 3:
Naplatna rampa Nais zapadno (20 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 4:
Makpetrol A1 (16 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 5:
Makpetrol (13 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 6:
Skotina dir Athen (21 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 7:
Shell (23 min, 10% → 74%)
- Arrival: Athens
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Vienna (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (15 min, 23% → 66%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV Backa Topola jug (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 3:
OMV smer Beograd (10 min, 19% → 39%)
-
Stop 4:
JP Putevi Srbije (19 min, 15% → 69%)
-
Stop 5:
Naplatna rampa Nais zapadno (21 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 6:
Makpetrol A1 (14 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 7:
Makpetrol (14 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 8:
Skotina dir Athen (19 min, 10% → 66%)
-
Stop 9:
Shell (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 10:
Atalanti Süd (10 min, 24% → 54%)
- Arrival: Athens
Why the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 achieved a 5-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 1711km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~270 kWh vs ~283 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons