In our Vienna to Bern EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 7 minutes, completing the 827km route in 8h 29min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 1 charging stops compared to 2 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 8h 29min (7 min faster)
- Charging stops: 1
- Charging time: 13min
- Energy: ~129 kWh
- Distance: 827km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
8h 29min |
8h 36min |
| Charging time: |
13min |
20min |
| Charging stops: |
1 |
2 |
| Energy used |
~149 kWh |
~149 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Vienna (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
TotalEnergies Tankstelle Autohof Holzgünz (13 min, 11% → 66%)
- Arrival: Bern
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Vienna (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aral Tankstelle Garmischer Straße (10 min, 14% → 58%)
-
Stop 2:
Mercedes-Benz Charging Hub Weißensberg Autohaus Riess (10 min, 23% → 63%)
- Arrival: Bern
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 7-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 827km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 1 stops vs 2 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 13min vs 20min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~129 kWh vs ~152 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons