In our Vienna to Brussels EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance by 4 minutes, completing the 1107km route in 10h 30min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 3, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 2 charging stops compared to 3 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 10h 30min (4 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 25min
- Energy: ~172 kWh
- Distance: 1107km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
10h 30min |
10h 34min |
| Charging time: |
25min |
30min |
| Charging stops: |
2 |
3 |
| Energy used |
~199 kWh |
~199 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Vienna (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger Select Hotel (12 min, 11% → 61%)
-
Stop 2:
Nentershausen Ost (13 min, 10% → 65%)
- Arrival: Brussels
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Vienna (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Porsche Zentrum Regensburg (10 min, 26% → 65%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Haidt Nord (10 min, 31% → 68%)
-
Stop 3:
Rastplatz Logebachtal Ost (10 min, 16% → 59%)
- Arrival: Brussels
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 4-minute advantage over Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance on this 1107km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 3 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 25min vs 30min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~172 kWh vs ~181 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons