In our Vienna to Dublin EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi e-tron GT by 60 minutes, completing the 2052km route in 23h 12min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 6, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 7 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 23h 12min (60 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 1h 18min
- Energy: ~335 kWh
- Distance: 2052km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi e-tron GT |
| Travel time |
23h 12min |
24h 12min |
| Charging time: |
1h 18min |
2h 15min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
10 |
| Energy used |
~369 kWh |
~373 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Vienna (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aral Tankstelle Nürnberger Straße 23 (14 min, 11% → 70%)
-
Stop 2:
Nentershausen Ost (10 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 3:
Hotel Prins van Oranje (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 4:
ENGIE Eurotunnel Main Terminal (12 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 5:
Supercharger Poplars Garden Centre (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 6:
Supercharger Mountain Park Hotel (10 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 7:
Circle K Dublin Port (10 min, 10% → 18%)
- Arrival: Dublin
Audi e-tron GT Route
- Start: Vienna (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Bayerischer Wald Nord (12 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 2:
Im Gewerbepark (10 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 3:
Shell Tankstelle (13 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 4:
Rastplatz Logebachtal Ost (17 min, 10% → 69%)
-
Stop 5:
JBC (10 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 6:
Diksmuidestraat (14 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY Village Hotel (14 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 8:
Roadchef Watford Gap Northbound (17 min, 10% → 69%)
-
Stop 9:
Supercharger Mountain Park Hotel (18 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 10:
Sir John Rogerson's Quay (10 min, 10% → 19%)
- Arrival: Dublin
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 60-minute advantage over Audi e-tron GT on this 2052km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 18min vs 2h 15min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~335 kWh vs ~459 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons