In our Vienna to Dublin EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance by 8 minutes, completing the 2052km route in 23h 12min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 7 charging stops compared to 8 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 23h 12min (8 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 1h 18min
- Energy: ~335 kWh
- Distance: 2052km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
23h 12min |
23h 20min |
| Charging time: |
1h 18min |
1h 33min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
8 |
| Energy used |
~369 kWh |
~369 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Vienna (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aral Tankstelle Nürnberger Straße 23 (14 min, 11% → 70%)
-
Stop 2:
Nentershausen Ost (10 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 3:
Hotel Prins van Oranje (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 4:
ENGIE Eurotunnel Main Terminal (12 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 5:
Supercharger Poplars Garden Centre (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 6:
Supercharger Mountain Park Hotel (10 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 7:
Circle K Dublin Port (10 min, 10% → 18%)
- Arrival: Dublin
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Vienna (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Porsche Zentrum Regensburg (11 min, 15% → 63%)
-
Stop 2:
PWC Rastanlage Kohlsberg Nord (10 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 3:
Rastplatz Logebachtal Ost (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 4:
JBC (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 5:
ENGIE Eurotunnel Main Terminal (14 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 6:
Supercharger Poplars Garden Centre (14 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 7:
Supercharger Mountain Park Hotel (12 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 8:
Sir John Rogerson's Quay (10 min, 10% → 18%)
- Arrival: Dublin
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 8-minute advantage over Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance on this 2052km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 8 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 18min vs 1h 33min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~335 kWh vs ~368 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons