In our Vienna to Dublin EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the Tesla Model S 2023 by 130 minutes, completing the 2048km route in 23h 14min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 8 charging stops compared to 9 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 23h 14min (130 min faster)
- Charging stops: 8
- Charging time: 1h 27min
- Energy: ~376 kWh
- Distance: 2048km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
Tesla Model S 2023 |
| Travel time |
23h 14min |
25h 24min |
| Charging time: |
1h 27min |
3h 18min |
| Charging stops: |
8 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~369 kWh |
~374 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Vienna (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Porsche Zentrum Regensburg (10 min, 17% → 62%)
-
Stop 2:
PWC Rastanlage Kohlsberg Nord (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Rastplatz Logebachtal Ost (10 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 4:
JBC (10 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 5:
ENGIE Eurotunnel Main Terminal (13 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 6:
Supercharger Poplars Garden Centre (13 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 7:
Supercharger Mountain Park Hotel (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 8:
Sir John Rogerson's Quay (10 min, 10% → 18%)
- Arrival: Dublin
Tesla Model S 2023 Route
- Start: Vienna (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aral Max-Plank-Straße (20 min, 17% → 53%)
-
Stop 2:
Aral Autohof Mainfrankenpark (31 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 3:
Aral Autohof Dachsberg (35 min, 10% → 71%)
-
Stop 4:
Supercharger IBIS Aalst Centrum (15 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 5:
Supercharger Eurotunnel Flexiplus Lounge (20 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 6:
Supercharger Welcome Break Services (16 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 7:
Supercharger Hilton Park Northbound (23 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 8:
Port of Holyhead (28 min, 10% → 35%)
-
Stop 9:
Sir John Rogerson's Quay (10 min, 10% → 18%)
- Arrival: Dublin
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 130-minute advantage over Tesla Model S 2023 on this 2048km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 8 stops vs 9 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 27min vs 3h 18min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~376 kWh vs ~385 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons