In our Vienna to Madrid EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi e-tron 55 by 140 minutes, completing the 2293km route in 23h 56min. The key advantage? 5 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 7 charging stops compared to 12 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 23h 56min (140 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 1h 15min
- Energy: ~374 kWh
- Distance: 2293km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi e-tron 55 |
| Travel time |
23h 56min |
26h 16min |
| Charging time: |
1h 15min |
3h 28min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
12 |
| Energy used |
~413 kWh |
~414 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Vienna (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Lechwiesen Nord (10 min, 14% → 58%)
-
Stop 2:
Migrol Service (10 min, 14% → 58%)
-
Stop 3:
Backstage Pub (11 min, 11% → 62%)
-
Stop 4:
Aire de La Coucourde (11 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 5:
Aire de Gasparets (13 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Vila Sana (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 7:
Área de Servicio Gasolprice (10 min, 13% → 59%)
- Arrival: Madrid
Audi e-tron 55 Route
- Start: Vienna (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aigner Powerful Logistics (10 min, 34% → 62%)
-
Stop 2:
Aral Tankstelle Garmischer Straße (19 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 3:
HOFER (16 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
Kölliken Nord (21 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 5:
Backstage Pub (25 min, 10% → 76%)
-
Stop 6:
Total Relais La Bayanne (14 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 7:
Aire d'Estézargues Nord (19 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 8:
Aire de Gasparets (23 min, 10% → 73%)
-
Stop 9:
IONITY Mas de la Sala (10 min, 10% → 37%)
-
Stop 10:
IONITY Vila Sana (17 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 11:
Calle Gaspar Torrente (13 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 12:
IONITY Ariza Norte (21 min, 10% → 67%)
- Arrival: Madrid
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 140-minute advantage over Audi e-tron 55 on this 2293km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 12 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 15min vs 3h 28min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~374 kWh vs ~565 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons