In our Vienna to Madrid EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi Q4 40 e-tron by 105 minutes, completing the 2293km route in 23h 56min. The key advantage? 5 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 20, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 7 charging stops compared to 12 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 23h 56min (105 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 1h 15min
- Energy: ~374 kWh
- Distance: 2293km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi Q4 40 e-tron |
| Travel time |
23h 56min |
25h 41min |
| Charging time: |
1h 15min |
2h 50min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
12 |
| Energy used |
~413 kWh |
~413 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Vienna (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Lechwiesen Nord (10 min, 14% → 58%)
-
Stop 2:
Migrol Service (10 min, 14% → 58%)
-
Stop 3:
Backstage Pub (11 min, 11% → 62%)
-
Stop 4:
Aire de La Coucourde (11 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 5:
Aire de Gasparets (13 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Vila Sana (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 7:
Área de Servicio Gasolprice (10 min, 13% → 59%)
- Arrival: Madrid
Audi Q4 40 e-tron Route
- Start: Vienna (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Fastned Burger King (12 min, 15% → 49%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV Tankstelle (12 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 3:
Rastplatz Hexentobel Nord (12 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 4:
Rastplatz Chölfeld (13 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 5:
Backstage Pub (10 min, 10% → 37%)
-
Stop 6:
Aire de Drumettaz (15 min, 13% → 53%)
-
Stop 7:
Aire de La Coucourde (16 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 8:
Aire de Gigean Nord (14 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 9:
ANDGO (23 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 10:
IONITY Vila Sana (14 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 11:
Calle Gaspar Torrente (11 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 12:
IONITY Ariza Norte (18 min, 10% → 57%)
- Arrival: Madrid
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 105-minute advantage over Audi Q4 40 e-tron on this 2293km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 12 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 15min vs 2h 50min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~374 kWh vs ~424 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons