In our Vienna to Madrid EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Ford Capri Extended Range by 75 minutes, completing the 2297km route in 23h 58min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 7 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 23h 58min (75 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 1h 12min
- Energy: ~357 kWh
- Distance: 2297km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Ford Capri Extended Range |
| Travel time |
23h 58min |
25h 13min |
| Charging time: |
1h 12min |
2h 27min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
10 |
| Energy used |
~413 kWh |
~414 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Vienna (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aral Tankstelle Garmischer Straße (10 min, 28% → 66%)
-
Stop 2:
Rastplatz Hexentobel Nord (10 min, 22% → 63%)
-
Stop 3:
Backstage Pub (10 min, 11% → 59%)
-
Stop 4:
Aire de La Coucourde (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
Aire De Lespignan Nord (10 min, 14% → 58%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Mas de la Sala (10 min, 13% → 59%)
-
Stop 7:
Sercotel Plaza Feria (12 min, 10% → 63%)
- Arrival: Madrid
Ford Capri Extended Range Route
- Start: Vienna (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Fastned Burger King (14 min, 21% → 61%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV Tankstelle (11 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 3:
Rastplatz Birrhard (16 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 4:
Backstage Pub (18 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 5:
Total Relais La Bayanne (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 6:
Aire d'Estézargues Nord (14 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 7:
Aire de Gasparets (16 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 8:
IONITY Mas de la Sala (24 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 9:
Calle Gaspar Torrente (10 min, 10% → 39%)
-
Stop 10:
IONITY Ariza Norte (14 min, 11% → 54%)
- Arrival: Madrid
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 75-minute advantage over Ford Capri Extended Range on this 2297km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 12min vs 2h 27min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~357 kWh vs ~376 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons