In our Vienna to Oslo EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Tesla Model Y Long-Range by 14 minutes, completing the 1610km route in 20h 12min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 6 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 20h 12min (14 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 48min
- Energy: ~251 kWh
- Distance: 1610km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Tesla Model Y Long-Range |
| Travel time |
20h 12min |
20h 26min |
| Charging time: |
48min |
1h 2min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
6 |
| Energy used |
~290 kWh |
~290 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Vienna (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
SachsenEnergie City Center (10 min, 24% → 61%)
-
Stop 2:
Shell Recharge Autohof Herzsprung (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Farø (17 min, 14% → 75%)
-
Stop 4:
Supercharger Importgatan (11 min, 10% → 60%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Tesla Model Y Long-Range Route
- Start: Vienna (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
SachsenEnergie City Center (10 min, 13% → 52%)
-
Stop 2:
Netto / Getränke Hoffmann (11 min, 11% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
HEM Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 4:
Circle K Tappernøje Øst (11 min, 17% → 59%)
-
Stop 5:
McDonald's (10 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 6:
Tradenvägen (10 min, 10% → 50%)
- Arrival: Oslo
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 14-minute advantage over Tesla Model Y Long-Range on this 1610km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 6 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 48min vs 1h 2min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~251 kWh vs ~283 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons