In our Vienna to Paris EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi Q4 35 e-tron by 93 minutes, completing the 1240km route in 11h 42min. The key advantage? 7 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 3 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 11h 42min (93 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 34min
- Energy: ~202 kWh
- Distance: 1240km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi Q4 35 e-tron |
| Travel time |
11h 42min |
13h 15min |
| Charging time: |
34min |
1h 58min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
10 |
| Energy used |
~223 kWh |
~224 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Vienna (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Total Tankstelle (10 min, 22% → 63%)
-
Stop 2:
Bonfelder Straße (13 min, 18% → 69%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Verdun Saint-Nicolas Nord (11 min, 10% → 60%)
- Arrival: Paris
Audi Q4 35 e-tron Route
- Start: Vienna (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Aigner Powerful Logistics (10 min, 15% → 47%)
-
Stop 2:
Donautal Ost (10 min, 26% → 60%)
-
Stop 3:
Total Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 4:
Autohof Schwabach West (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 5:
BFS Business Fleet Services (10 min, 11% → 43%)
-
Stop 6:
ATU (10 min, 11% → 43%)
-
Stop 7:
Tank & Rast Raststätte Pfalz (12 min, 11% → 51%)
-
Stop 8:
McDonald's (21 min, 10% → 71%)
-
Stop 9:
Fastned Aire de Valmy Le Moulin (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 10:
IONITY Aire de Gueux (15 min, 13% → 60%)
- Arrival: Paris
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 93-minute advantage over Audi Q4 35 e-tron on this 1240km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 34min vs 1h 58min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~202 kWh vs ~236 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons