In our Vienna to Riga EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance by 2 minutes, completing the 1321km route in 14h 57min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance's 524km range doesn't beat the Audi Q6 e-tron performance's 512km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 3 charging stops compared to 5 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 14h 57min (2 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 1h 10min
- Energy: ~243 kWh
- Distance: 1321km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
14h 59min |
14h 57min |
| Charging time: |
1h 10min |
1h 10min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
3 |
| Energy used |
~238 kWh |
~239 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Vienna (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
MOP Dobieszowice Wschód (10 min, 15% → 39%)
-
Stop 2:
Orlen Stobiecko Szlacheckie Wschód (10 min, 18% → 49%)
-
Stop 3:
Blue City (16 min, 11% → 72%)
-
Stop 4:
Kaufland (24 min, 10% → 71%)
-
Stop 5:
Cafe Baltica (10 min, 10% → 41%)
- Arrival: Riga
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Vienna (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
MOP Dobieszowice Wschód (19 min, 17% → 66%)
-
Stop 2:
Blue City (27 min, 10% → 86%)
-
Stop 3:
Hesburger Kantališkiai (24 min, 10% → 74%)
- Arrival: Riga
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 2-minute advantage over Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance on this 1321km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 5 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
Related Comparisons