In our Vienna to Rome EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 43 minutes, completing the 1091km route in 10h 52min. The key advantage? 4 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 2 charging stops compared to 6 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 10h 52min (43 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 30min
- Energy: ~178 kWh
- Distance: 1091km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
10h 52min |
11h 35min |
| Charging time: |
30min |
1h 6min |
| Charging stops: |
2 |
6 |
| Energy used |
~196 kWh |
~197 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Vienna (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Ledra Ovest, Colloredo di Monte Albano (17 min, 19% → 78%)
-
Stop 2:
Ristorante Goyo, Calenzano (13 min, 10% → 65%)
- Arrival: Rome
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Vienna (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Billa Töschling, Techelsberg am Wörther See (10 min, 11% → 46%)
-
Stop 2:
Ledra Ovest, Colloredo di Monte Albano (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Omnia Hotel, Noventa di Piave (10 min, 14% → 47%)
-
Stop 4:
Adige Ovest, Costa di Rovigo (12 min, 16% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
Ristorante Goyo, Calenzano (13 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 6:
Area di Servizio Fabro Ovest, Fabro (11 min, 10% → 50%)
- Arrival: Rome
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 43-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 1091km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 6 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 30min vs 1h 6min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~178 kWh vs ~180 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons