In our Vienna to Rome EV duel, the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 by 50 minutes, completing the 1092km route in 10h 59min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 20, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 3 charging stops compared to 6 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 10h 59min (50 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 35min
- Energy: ~196 kWh
- Distance: 1092km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
10h 59min |
11h 49min |
| Charging time: |
35min |
1h 20min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
6 |
| Energy used |
~197 kWh |
~197 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Vienna (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Electra Pizza Plus, Villach (12 min, 29% → 73%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Eni, Monselice (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 3:
Arno Ovest, Reggello (12 min, 10% → 64%)
- Arrival: Rome
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Vienna (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Hofer Völkermarkter Straße, St. Veit an der Glan (15 min, 14% → 58%)
-
Stop 2:
Ledra Ovest, Colloredo di Monte Albano (13 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Centro Commerciale Porte di Mestre, Venezia (13 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 4:
Castel Bentivoglio Ovest, Bentivoglio (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 5:
Ristorante Goyo, Calenzano (15 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 6:
Area di Servizio Fabro Ovest, Fabro (14 min, 10% → 53%)
- Arrival: Rome
Why the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 50-minute advantage over Renault 4 E-Tech 150 on this 1092km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 6 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 35min vs 1h 20min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons