In our Vienna to Sofia EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron 55 by 104 minutes, completing the 1008km route in 10h 2min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 2 charging stops compared to 5 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 10h 2min (104 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 35min
- Energy: ~165 kWh
- Distance: 1008km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron 55 |
| Travel time |
10h 2min |
11h 46min |
| Charging time: |
35min |
2h 17min |
| Charging stops: |
2 |
5 |
| Energy used |
~181 kWh |
~181 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Vienna (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (11 min, 49% → 78%)
-
Stop 2:
JP Putevi Srbije (24 min, 10% → 79%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron 55 Route
- Start: Vienna (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (20 min, 24% → 64%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV Backa Topola jug (10 min, 10% → 35%)
-
Stop 3:
OMV smer Beograd (71 min, 10% → 90%)
-
Stop 4:
Naplatna rampa Nais zapadno (24 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 5:
OMV (12 min, 10% → 27%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 104-minute advantage over Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron 55 on this 1008km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 5 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 35min vs 2h 17min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~165 kWh vs ~223 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons