In our Vienna to Sofia EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the XPENG G6 RWD Long Range 2025 by 32 minutes, completing the 1006km route in 9h 58min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 3, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 2 charging stops compared to 3 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 9h 58min (32 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 34min
- Energy: ~157 kWh
- Distance: 1006km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
XPENG G6 RWD Long Range 2025 |
| Travel time |
9h 58min |
10h 30min |
| Charging time: |
34min |
42min |
| Charging stops: |
2 |
3 |
| Energy used |
~181 kWh |
~181 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Vienna (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (10 min, 52% → 77%)
-
Stop 2:
Ledi MS (24 min, 23% → 86%)
- Arrival: Sofia
XPENG G6 RWD Long Range 2025 Route
- Start: Vienna (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (10 min, 33% → 86%)
-
Stop 2:
Ledi MS (10 min, 11% → 77%)
-
Stop 3:
Naplatna rampa Nais zapadno (22 min, 13% → 51%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 32-minute advantage over XPENG G6 RWD Long Range 2025 on this 1006km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 3 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 34min vs 42min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~157 kWh vs ~192 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons