In our Vienna to Sofia EV duel, the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 11 minutes, completing the 1005km route in 10h 57min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on August 13, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge's 363km range doesn't beat the Renault 5 E-Tech 150's 330km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 needs only 3 charging stops compared to 5 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 5 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 10h 57min (11 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 1h 36min
- Energy: ~158 kWh
- Distance: 1005km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
10h 57min |
11h 8min |
| Charging time: |
1h 36min |
1h 15min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
5 |
| Energy used |
~181 kWh |
~181 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Vienna (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (35 min, 17% → 96%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV smer Beograd (42 min, 10% → 98%)
-
Stop 3:
Naplatna rampa Nais zapadno (19 min, 10% → 61%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Vienna (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (15 min, 23% → 66%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV Backa Topola jug (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 3:
OMV smer Beograd (10 min, 19% → 39%)
-
Stop 4:
JP Putevi Srbije (19 min, 15% → 69%)
-
Stop 5:
Naplatna rampa Nais zapadno (21 min, 10% → 58%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Why the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 achieved a 11-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 1005km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 5 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~158 kWh vs ~166 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons