In our Vilnius to Berlin EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 58 minutes, completing the 1071km route in 10h 38min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 6, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 3 charging stops compared to 5 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 10h 38min (58 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 33min
- Energy: ~175 kWh
- Distance: 1071km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
10h 38min |
11h 36min |
| Charging time: |
33min |
1h 23min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
5 |
| Energy used |
~193 kWh |
~192 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Vilnius (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Pas Lado (10 min, 83% → 90%)
-
Stop 2:
Factory Annopol (10 min, 14% → 61%)
-
Stop 3:
MOP Chwałszyce (13 min, 10% → 66%)
- Arrival: Berlin
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Vilnius (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
McDonald's Dubowo Drugie (34 min, 35% → 86%)
-
Stop 2:
Factory Annopol (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Nowostawy (14 min, 14% → 58%)
-
Stop 4:
MOP Chwałszyce (14 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 5:
MOP Walewice (11 min, 10% → 50%)
- Arrival: Berlin
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 58-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 1071km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 5 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 33min vs 1h 23min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~175 kWh vs ~177 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons