In our Vilnius to Berlin EV duel, the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 beats the MG MG4 64kWh by 30 minutes, completing the 1064km route in 11h 34min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 6, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The MG MG4 64kWh's 360km range doesn't beat the Renault 5 E-Tech 150's 330km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 needs only 6 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 5 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 11h 34min (30 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 21min
- Energy: ~168 kWh
- Distance: 1064km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
MG MG4 64kWh |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
12h 4min |
11h 34min |
| Charging time: |
1h 41min |
1h 21min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
6 |
| Energy used |
~192 kWh |
~192 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
MG MG4 64kWh Route
- Start: Vilnius (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
McDonald's Dubowo Drugie (19 min, 26% → 68%)
-
Stop 2:
Kaufland (17 min, 10% → 39%)
-
Stop 3:
Factory Annopol (11 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Nowostawy (13 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 5:
MOP Osiecza (12 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 6:
MOP Dopiewiec (12 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 7:
MOP Walewice (17 min, 10% → 56%)
- Arrival: Berlin
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Vilnius (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
McDonald's Dubowo Drugie (27 min, 30% → 92%)
-
Stop 2:
Factory Annopol (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Nowostawy (11 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 4:
MOP Osiecza (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 5:
MOP Dopiewiec (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 6:
MOP Walewice (13 min, 10% → 53%)
- Arrival: Berlin
Why the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 achieved a 30-minute advantage over MG MG4 64kWh on this 1064km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 21min vs 1h 41min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~168 kWh vs ~180 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons