In our Vilnius to Bern EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the Volvo EX90 Twin Motor by 32 minutes, completing the 1902km route in 19h 39min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 7 charging stops compared to 9 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 19h 39min (32 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 1h 24min
- Energy: ~349 kWh
- Distance: 1902km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
Volvo EX90 Twin Motor |
| Travel time |
19h 39min |
20h 11min |
| Charging time: |
1h 24min |
1h 49min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~342 kWh |
~344 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Vilnius (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Hesburger Kantališkiai (10 min, 69% → 83%)
-
Stop 2:
Factory Annopol (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Nowostawy (14 min, 33% → 77%)
-
Stop 4:
Shell (13 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 5:
EnBW Schnellladepark (12 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 6:
TotalEnergies Tankstelle (15 min, 10% → 71%)
-
Stop 7:
Empfinger Hof (10 min, 10% → 58%)
- Arrival: Bern
Volvo EX90 Twin Motor Route
- Start: Vilnius (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
McDonald's Dubowo Drugie (12 min, 51% → 67%)
-
Stop 2:
Factory Annopol (14 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 3:
Hotel Na Półboru (12 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 4:
Citronex (12 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Shell (13 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 6:
Autohof Niederdorf (12 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 7:
TotalEnergies Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 8:
IONITY Hohenlohe Nord (12 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 9:
Dehner Garten-Center (12 min, 10% → 49%)
- Arrival: Bern
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 32-minute advantage over Volvo EX90 Twin Motor on this 1902km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 9 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 24min vs 1h 49min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~349 kWh vs ~433 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons