In our Vilnius to Bratislava EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 42 minutes, completing the 1132km route in 12h 7min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 6 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 12h 7min (42 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 46min
- Energy: ~208 kWh
- Distance: 1132km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
12h 7min |
12h 49min |
| Charging time: |
46min |
1h 27min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
6 |
| Energy used |
~204 kWh |
~204 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Vilnius (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Hesburger Kantališkiai (10 min, 69% → 83%)
-
Stop 2:
Factory Annopol (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Hotel Górski (14 min, 26% → 64%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Avion Shopping Park (12 min, 10% → 63%)
- Arrival: Bratislava
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Vilnius (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
McDonald's Dubowo Drugie (34 min, 35% → 86%)
-
Stop 2:
Factory Annopol (11 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 3:
Hotel Górski (10 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 4:
MOP Woźniki Zachód (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 5:
Uniwar P1 (10 min, 14% → 48%)
-
Stop 6:
Kaufland (12 min, 10% → 51%)
- Arrival: Bratislava
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 42-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 1132km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 6 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 46min vs 1h 27min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons