In our Vilnius to Bratislava EV duel, the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 beats the smart #1 Pro+ by 8 minutes, completing the 1132km route in 12h 48min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on August 23, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The smart #1 Pro+'s 340km range doesn't beat the Renault 5 E-Tech 150's 330km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 needs only 6 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 5 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 12h 48min (8 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 29min
- Energy: ~178 kWh
- Distance: 1132km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
smart #1 Pro+ |
| Travel time |
12h 48min |
12h 56min |
| Charging time: |
1h 29min |
1h 27min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~204 kWh |
~203 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Vilnius (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
McDonald's Dubowo Drugie (27 min, 30% → 92%)
-
Stop 2:
Factory Annopol (13 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 3:
Hotel Górski (12 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 4:
MOP Woźniki Zachód (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 5:
Uniwar P1 (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 6:
Signalbau (17 min, 10% → 62%)
- Arrival: Bratislava
smart #1 Pro+ Route
- Start: Vilnius (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
McDonald's Dubowo Drugie (12 min, 32% → 63%)
-
Stop 2:
Kaufland (16 min, 10% → 37%)
-
Stop 3:
Factory Annopol (12 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 4:
Hotel Górski (11 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 5:
MOP Woźniki Zachód (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 6:
Uniwar P1 (10 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 7:
Signalbau (16 min, 12% → 61%)
- Arrival: Bratislava
Why the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 achieved a 8-minute advantage over smart #1 Pro+ on this 1132km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~178 kWh vs ~206 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons