In our Vilnius to Brussels EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 24 minutes, completing the 1787km route in 17h 20min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 6 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 17h 20min (24 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 50min
- Energy: ~278 kWh
- Distance: 1787km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
17h 20min |
17h 44min |
| Charging time: |
50min |
1h 13min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
6 |
| Energy used |
~322 kWh |
~322 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Vilnius (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Factory Annopol (10 min, 14% → 58%)
-
Stop 2:
MOP Skarboszewo (10 min, 14% → 58%)
-
Stop 3:
Aral Tankstelle Friedenstraße (10 min, 12% → 56%)
-
Stop 4:
Fastned Rastplatz Uhry Nord (10 min, 14% → 60%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Lichtendorf Nord (10 min, 10% → 58%)
- Arrival: Brussels
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Vilnius (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Hesburger Kantališkiai (10 min, 69% → 83%)
-
Stop 2:
Factory Annopol (12 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 3:
MOP Skarboszewo (13 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 4:
Aral Tankstelle Friedenstraße (11 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 5:
Fastned Rastplatz Uhry Nord (14 min, 10% → 69%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Lichtendorf Nord (13 min, 10% → 67%)
- Arrival: Brussels
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 24-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 1787km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 6 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 50min vs 1h 13min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~278 kWh vs ~328 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons