In our Vilnius to Brussels EV duel, the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the smart #1 Pro+ by 85 minutes, completing the 1789km route in 17h 49min. The key advantage? 5 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 7 charging stops compared to 12 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 17h 49min (85 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 1h 17min
- Energy: ~321 kWh
- Distance: 1789km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance |
smart #1 Pro+ |
| Travel time |
17h 49min |
19h 14min |
| Charging time: |
1h 17min |
2h 25min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
12 |
| Energy used |
~322 kWh |
~322 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Vilnius (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Hesburger Kantališkiai (12 min, 68% → 85%)
-
Stop 2:
Factory Annopol (12 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 3:
MOP Skarboszewo (13 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 4:
Autohaus König (10 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 5:
Aral Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 6:
Fastned Rastplatz Löwenburg (10 min, 18% → 60%)
-
Stop 7:
Shell Tankstelle Werstener Kreuz (10 min, 16% → 59%)
- Arrival: Brussels
smart #1 Pro+ Route
- Start: Vilnius (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
McDonald's Dubowo Drugie (12 min, 32% → 63%)
-
Stop 2:
Kaufland (10 min, 10% → 26%)
-
Stop 3:
Shell (10 min, 16% → 46%)
-
Stop 4:
MOP Bolimów (10 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 5:
Gościniec Zacisze (14 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 6:
MOP Dopiewiec (10 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 7:
MOP Walewice (14 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 8:
Circle K Autohof Ferch (15 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 9:
Fastned Rastplatz Uhry Nord (13 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 10:
Fastned Rastplatz Löwenburg (12 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 11:
IONITY Lichtendorf Nord (10 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 12:
P&R Parkplatz Alfred-Wirth-Straße (15 min, 10% → 58%)
- Arrival: Brussels
Why the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 85-minute advantage over smart #1 Pro+ on this 1789km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 12 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 17min vs 2h 25min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~321 kWh vs ~326 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons