In our Vilnius to Rome EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi e-tron GT by 73 minutes, completing the 2266km route in 23h 7min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 8 charging stops compared to 11 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 23h 7min (73 min faster)
- Charging stops: 8
- Charging time: 1h 28min
- Energy: ~370 kWh
- Distance: 2266km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi e-tron GT |
| Travel time |
23h 7min |
24h 20min |
| Charging time: |
1h 28min |
2h 37min |
| Charging stops: |
8 |
11 |
| Energy used |
~408 kWh |
~408 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Vilnius (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Pas Lado (10 min, 83% → 90%)
-
Stop 2:
Factory Annopol (10 min, 14% → 58%)
-
Stop 3:
Orlen Stobiecko Szlacheckie Zachód (14 min, 23% → 68%)
-
Stop 4:
Mořice Bistro (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
OMV Raststation Bad Fischau (10 min, 13% → 59%)
-
Stop 6:
Billa Töschling (14 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY Eni (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 8:
Osteria De'Giusti (10 min, 13% → 57%)
- Arrival: Rome
Audi e-tron GT Route
- Start: Vilnius (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
McDonald's Dubowo Drugie (21 min, 41% → 79%)
-
Stop 2:
Factory Annopol (10 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 3:
Hotel Górski (10 min, 11% → 42%)
-
Stop 4:
MOP Woźniki Zachód (10 min, 10% → 37%)
-
Stop 5:
Uniwar P1 (11 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 6:
Mořice Bistro (17 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 7:
OMV Raststation Bad Fischau (14 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 8:
OMV Tankstelle (14 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 9:
Ledra Ovest (18 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 10:
Ewiva Parco Commerciale Diamante (17 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 11:
Area Servizio Badia al Pino Ovest (15 min, 10% → 63%)
- Arrival: Rome
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 73-minute advantage over Audi e-tron GT on this 2266km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 8 stops vs 11 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 28min vs 2h 37min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~370 kWh vs ~507 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons