In our Vilnius to Sofia EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the VW ID.3 Pro S 2023 by 69 minutes, completing the 1960km route in 22h 16min. The key advantage? 4 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 9 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 22h 16min (69 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 1h 37min
- Energy: ~320 kWh
- Distance: 1960km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
VW ID.3 Pro S 2023 |
| Travel time |
22h 16min |
23h 25min |
| Charging time: |
1h 37min |
2h 32min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~353 kWh |
~353 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Vilnius (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Pas Lado (10 min, 83% → 90%)
-
Stop 2:
Factory Annopol (14 min, 14% → 71%)
-
Stop 3:
Centrum Zakupowe Jan (28 min, 10% → 84%)
-
Stop 4:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (13 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 5:
Ledi MS (32 min, 10% → 90%)
- Arrival: Sofia
VW ID.3 Pro S 2023 Route
- Start: Vilnius (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
McDonald's Dubowo Drugie (14 min, 48% → 71%)
-
Stop 2:
Factory Annopol (13 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 3:
Shell MOP West (11 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 4:
Centrum Zakupowe Jan (10 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 5:
Tesco Teplická cesta (13 min, 17% → 56%)
-
Stop 6:
Tesco (10 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (17 min, 15% → 63%)
-
Stop 8:
OMV smer Beograd (43 min, 10% → 75%)
-
Stop 9:
Naplatna rampa Nais zapadno (21 min, 10% → 48%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 69-minute advantage over VW ID.3 Pro S 2023 on this 1960km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 9 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 37min vs 2h 32min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~320 kWh vs ~328 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons