In our Vilnius to Sofia EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi Q4 Sportback 40 e-tron by 137 minutes, completing the 1952km route in 21h 57min. The key advantage? 5 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 9 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 21h 57min (137 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 1h 15min
- Energy: ~304 kWh
- Distance: 1952km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Audi Q4 Sportback 40 e-tron |
| Travel time |
21h 57min |
24h 14min |
| Charging time: |
1h 15min |
3h 21min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~351 kWh |
~353 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Vilnius (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Ekoen Atrium Reduta (13 min, 11% → 66%)
-
Stop 2:
Centrum Zakupowe Jan (23 min, 10% → 80%)
-
Stop 3:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (12 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 4:
Ledi MS (27 min, 10% → 86%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Audi Q4 Sportback 40 e-tron Route
- Start: Vilnius (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
McDonald's Dubowo Drugie (22 min, 43% → 77%)
-
Stop 2:
Factory Annopol (18 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 3:
Shell MOP West (12 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 4:
Centrum Zakupowe Jan (11 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 5:
Tesco Teplická cesta (20 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 6:
Tesco (12 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (26 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 8:
OMV smer Beograd (56 min, 10% → 82%)
-
Stop 9:
Naplatna rampa Nais zapadno (24 min, 10% → 52%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 137-minute advantage over Audi Q4 Sportback 40 e-tron on this 1952km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 9 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 15min vs 3h 21min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~304 kWh vs ~348 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons