In our Vilnius to Sofia EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance by 53 minutes, completing the 1952km route in 21h 57min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 21h 57min (53 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 1h 15min
- Energy: ~304 kWh
- Distance: 1952km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
21h 57min |
22h 50min |
| Charging time: |
1h 15min |
1h 58min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~351 kWh |
~353 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Vilnius (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Ekoen Atrium Reduta (13 min, 11% → 66%)
-
Stop 2:
Centrum Zakupowe Jan (23 min, 10% → 80%)
-
Stop 3:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (12 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 4:
Ledi MS (27 min, 10% → 86%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Vilnius (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Hesburger Kantališkiai (12 min, 68% → 85%)
-
Stop 2:
Factory Annopol (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
MOP Promna-Kolonia (10 min, 38% → 70%)
-
Stop 4:
Centrum Zakupowe Jan (21 min, 15% → 79%)
-
Stop 5:
Tesco (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (19 min, 12% → 79%)
-
Stop 7:
JP Putevi Srbije (36 min, 10% → 90%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 53-minute advantage over Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance on this 1952km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 15min vs 1h 58min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~304 kWh vs ~350 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons