In our Vilnius to Vienna EV duel, the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 beats the smart #1 Pro+ by 7 minutes, completing the 1169km route in 13h 4min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on August 25, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The smart #1 Pro+'s 340km range doesn't beat the Renault 5 E-Tech 150's 330km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 needs only 6 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 5 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 13h 4min (7 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 34min
- Energy: ~184 kWh
- Distance: 1169km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
smart #1 Pro+ |
| Travel time |
13h 4min |
13h 11min |
| Charging time: |
1h 34min |
1h 31min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~210 kWh |
~210 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Vilnius (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
McDonald's Dubowo Drugie (27 min, 30% → 92%)
-
Stop 2:
Factory Annopol (13 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 3:
Hotel Górski (12 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 4:
MOP Woźniki Zachód (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 5:
Uniwar P1 (20 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 6:
Teplárny Brno Olympia DC (12 min, 10% → 48%)
- Arrival: Vienna
smart #1 Pro+ Route
- Start: Vilnius (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
McDonald's Dubowo Drugie (12 min, 32% → 63%)
-
Stop 2:
Kaufland (16 min, 10% → 37%)
-
Stop 3:
Factory Annopol (12 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 4:
Hotel Górski (11 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 5:
MOP Woźniki Zachód (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 6:
Uniwar P1 (19 min, 10% → 66%)
-
Stop 7:
Teplárny Brno Olympia DC (11 min, 10% → 47%)
- Arrival: Vienna
Why the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 achieved a 7-minute advantage over smart #1 Pro+ on this 1169km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~184 kWh vs ~213 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons