In our Vilnius to Warsaw EV duel, the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 6 minutes, completing the 501km route in 5h 39min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 6, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge's 363km range doesn't beat the Renault 5 E-Tech 150's 330km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 needs only 1 charging stops compared to 2 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 5 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 5h 39min (6 min faster)
- Charging stops: 1
- Charging time: 29min
- Energy: ~79 kWh
- Distance: 501km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
5h 39min |
5h 45min |
| Charging time: |
29min |
26min |
| Charging stops: |
1 |
2 |
| Energy used |
~90 kWh |
~90 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Vilnius (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
McDonald's Dubowo Drugie (29 min, 30% → 94%)
- Arrival: Warsaw
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Vilnius (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
McDonald's Dubowo Drugie (10 min, 35% → 60%)
-
Stop 2:
Kaufland (16 min, 10% → 38%)
- Arrival: Warsaw
Why the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 achieved a 6-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 501km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 1 stops vs 2 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~79 kWh vs ~83 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons