In our Warsaw to Bern EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 15 minutes, completing the 1405km route in 13h 54min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 3 charging stops compared to 4 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 13h 54min (15 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 36min
- Energy: ~219 kWh
- Distance: 1405km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
13h 54min |
14h 9min |
| Charging time: |
36min |
49min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
4 |
| Energy used |
~253 kWh |
~253 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Warsaw (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Shell (13 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 2:
TotalEnergies Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 3:
dm-drogerie markt (13 min, 10% → 67%)
- Arrival: Bern
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Warsaw (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Shell (12 min, 11% → 54%)
-
Stop 2:
EnBW Schnellladepark (12 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 3:
TotalEnergies Tankstelle (15 min, 10% → 71%)
-
Stop 4:
Empfinger Hof (10 min, 10% → 58%)
- Arrival: Bern
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 15-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 1405km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 4 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 36min vs 49min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~219 kWh vs ~258 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons