In our Warsaw to Bern EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 51 minutes, completing the 1407km route in 14h 9min. The key advantage? 4 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 8 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 14h 9min (51 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 49min
- Energy: ~258 kWh
- Distance: 1407km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
14h 9min |
15h 0min |
| Charging time: |
49min |
1h 33min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
8 |
| Energy used |
~253 kWh |
~254 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Warsaw (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Shell (12 min, 11% → 54%)
-
Stop 2:
EnBW Schnellladepark (12 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 3:
TotalEnergies Tankstelle (15 min, 10% → 71%)
-
Stop 4:
Empfinger Hof (10 min, 10% → 58%)
- Arrival: Bern
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Warsaw (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Bar Mettos (13 min, 18% → 60%)
-
Stop 2:
KFC (15 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 3:
EnBW Schnellladepark (11 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 4:
EnBW Globus (10 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 5:
TotalEnergies Tankstelle (11 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 6:
BFS Business Fleet Services (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 7:
Sindelfinger Wald (10 min, 13% → 47%)
-
Stop 8:
Aral Tankstelle (13 min, 11% → 55%)
- Arrival: Bern
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 51-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 1407km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 8 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 49min vs 1h 33min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons