In our Warsaw to Bratislava EV duel, the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 beats the Kia Niro EV by 3 minutes, completing the 627km route in 6h 52min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Kia Niro EV's 370km range doesn't beat the Renault 4 E-Tech 150's 327km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Renault 4 E-Tech 150 needs only 2 charging stops compared to 3 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 4 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 6h 52min (3 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 35min
- Energy: ~100 kWh
- Distance: 627km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Kia Niro EV |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
6h 55min |
6h 52min |
| Charging time: |
39min |
35min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
2 |
| Energy used |
~113 kWh |
~113 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Kia Niro EV Route
- Start: Warsaw (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
MOP Dobieszowice Zachód (17 min, 26% → 61%)
-
Stop 2:
Signalbau (11 min, 10% → 34%)
-
Stop 3:
Smaltovňa Mišík (11 min, 10% → 33%)
- Arrival: Bratislava
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Warsaw (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
MOP Orlen Wieszowa Północ (17 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 2:
Signalbau (18 min, 10% → 63%)
- Arrival: Bratislava
Why the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 4 E-Tech 150 achieved a 3-minute advantage over Kia Niro EV on this 627km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 3 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 35min vs 39min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~100 kWh vs ~108 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons