In our Warsaw to Bucharest EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 63 minutes, completing the 1186km route in 17h 40min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 3 charging stops compared to 5 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 17h 40min (63 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 1h 12min
- Energy: ~194 kWh
- Distance: 1186km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
17h 40min |
18h 43min |
| Charging time: |
1h 12min |
2h 2min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
5 |
| Energy used |
~213 kWh |
~212 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Warsaw (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Revia Park (18 min, 52% → 85%)
-
Stop 2:
Elektrozaryadka 200Kvt (23 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 3:
Kaufland Sucedava (31 min, 10% → 76%)
- Arrival: Bucharest
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Warsaw (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Biedronka Revia Park (10 min, 27% → 55%)
-
Stop 2:
Audi Centre (60 min, 18% → 88%)
-
Stop 3:
Maysternya Smaku (18 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 4:
Kaufland Sucedava (24 min, 10% → 73%)
-
Stop 5:
Supercharger Galeria Mall (10 min, 10% → 44%)
- Arrival: Bucharest
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 63-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 1186km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 5 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 12min vs 2h 2min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~194 kWh vs ~196 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons