In our Warsaw to Budapest EV duel, the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 beats the MG MG4 64kWh by 17 minutes, completing the 680km route in 9h 19min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The MG MG4 64kWh's 360km range doesn't beat the Renault 5 E-Tech 150's 330km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 needs only 3 charging stops compared to 5 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 5 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 9h 19min (17 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 39min
- Energy: ~107 kWh
- Distance: 680km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
MG MG4 64kWh |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
9h 36min |
9h 19min |
| Charging time: |
50min |
39min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
3 |
| Energy used |
~122 kWh |
~123 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
MG MG4 64kWh Route
- Start: Warsaw (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Shell MOP West (10 min, 40% → 60%)
-
Stop 2:
Centrum Zakupowe Jan (10 min, 15% → 43%)
-
Stop 3:
OC VIA (10 min, 16% → 44%)
-
Stop 4:
Tesco Zvolenská cesta (10 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 5:
Slovnaft (10 min, 11% → 41%)
- Arrival: Budapest
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Warsaw (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Powerdot Galeria Krakowska (19 min, 12% → 68%)
-
Stop 2:
Donovalský Pivovar (10 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 3:
Dalioil (10 min, 10% → 41%)
- Arrival: Budapest
Why the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 achieved a 17-minute advantage over MG MG4 64kWh on this 680km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 5 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 39min vs 50min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~107 kWh vs ~115 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons