In our Warsaw to Paris EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the BYD Atto 3 by 119 minutes, completing the 1585km route in 15h 7min. The key advantage? 8 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 3, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 13 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 15h 7min (119 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 51min
- Energy: ~259 kWh
- Distance: 1585km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
BYD Atto 3 |
| Travel time |
15h 7min |
17h 6min |
| Charging time: |
51min |
2h 39min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
13 |
| Energy used |
~285 kWh |
~287 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Warsaw (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
MOP Dopiewiec (10 min, 40% → 72%)
-
Stop 2:
Allego Euro Rastpark Theeßen (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Fastned Rastplatz Löwenburg (11 min, 11% → 62%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Aachener Land Nord (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
Aire de La Sentinelle Ouest (10 min, 13% → 57%)
- Arrival: Paris
BYD Atto 3 Route
- Start: Warsaw (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Orlen A2 MOP Tulce (17 min, 12% → 51%)
-
Stop 2:
MOP Walewice (10 min, 10% → 35%)
-
Stop 3:
Autohaus König (10 min, 12% → 37%)
-
Stop 4:
Circle K Autohof Ferch (13 min, 13% → 44%)
-
Stop 5:
Shell Recharge Euro Rastpark Irxleben/Hohenwarsleben (12 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 6:
Shell Tankstelle Hämelerwald (11 min, 10% → 39%)
-
Stop 7:
Fastned Rastplatz Löwenburg (10 min, 10% → 36%)
-
Stop 8:
Autohaus Weber (12 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 9:
Remscheid West (15 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 10:
IONITY Shell Eupen (12 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 11:
Supercharger ibis Styles (13 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 12:
Aire de La Sentinelle Ouest (14 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 13:
Aire de Ressons Ouest (10 min, 10% → 36%)
- Arrival: Paris
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 119-minute advantage over BYD Atto 3 on this 1585km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 13 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 51min vs 2h 39min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~259 kWh vs ~283 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons