In our Warsaw to Paris EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Tesla Model 3 SR Plus by 26 minutes, completing the 1585km route in 15h 7min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 15h 7min (26 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 51min
- Energy: ~259 kWh
- Distance: 1585km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Tesla Model 3 SR Plus |
| Travel time |
15h 7min |
15h 33min |
| Charging time: |
51min |
1h 14min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~285 kWh |
~286 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Warsaw (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
MOP Dopiewiec (10 min, 40% → 72%)
-
Stop 2:
Allego Euro Rastpark Theeßen (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Fastned Rastplatz Löwenburg (11 min, 11% → 62%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Aachener Land Nord (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
Aire de La Sentinelle Ouest (10 min, 13% → 57%)
- Arrival: Paris
Tesla Model 3 SR Plus Route
- Start: Warsaw (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
MOP Dopiewiec (10 min, 23% → 58%)
-
Stop 2:
Autohaus König (13 min, 13% → 62%)
-
Stop 3:
Aral Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 4:
Fastned Rastplatz Löwenburg (10 min, 11% → 52%)
-
Stop 5:
Ehrenberg West (10 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Bierset (10 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 7:
Aire de La Sentinelle Ouest (11 min, 13% → 58%)
- Arrival: Paris
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 26-minute advantage over Tesla Model 3 SR Plus on this 1585km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 51min vs 1h 14min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~259 kWh vs ~296 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons